You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
In vivo Recording Quality of Mechanically Decoupled Floating Versus Skull-Fixed Silicon-Based Neural Probes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00464 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laetitia Chauvière, Frederick Pothof, Kai S. Gansel, Johanna Klon-Lipok, Arno A. A. Aarts, Tobias Holzhammer, Oliver Paul, Wolf J. Singer, Patrick Ruther |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 48 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 4% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 15% |
| Unknown | 12 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 14 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 23% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2021.
All research outputs
#14,920,631
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#6,106
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,338
of 364,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#152
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.