↓ Skip to main content

Cortical Topography of Error-Related High-Frequency Potentials During Erroneous Control in a Continuous Control Brain–Computer Interface

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cortical Topography of Error-Related High-Frequency Potentials During Erroneous Control in a Continuous Control Brain–Computer Interface
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00502
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nile R. Wilson, Devapratim Sarma, Jeremiah D. Wander, Kurt E. Weaver, Jeffrey G. Ojemann, Rajesh P. N. Rao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Researcher 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 11 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 4 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 8%
Psychology 2 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Other 2 8%
Unknown 12 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2019.
All research outputs
#16,728,456
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,428
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,353
of 364,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#202
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.