You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect of Cochlear Implants on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: Initial Baseline and 18-Month Follow Up Results for a Prospective International Longitudinal Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00789 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Sarant, David Harris, Peter Busby, Paul Maruff, Adrian Schembri, Richard Dowell, Robert Briggs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 25% |
| Australia | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 2 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 181 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 19% |
| Unknown | 67 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 17% |
| Psychology | 17 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 22 | 12% |
| Unknown | 79 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2022.
All research outputs
#3,115,554
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,170
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,811
of 359,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#70
of 342 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 359,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 342 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.