↓ Skip to main content

Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus’ Role in Visual Processing and Language Comprehension: A Combined MEG-DTI Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inferior Longitudinal Fasciculus’ Role in Visual Processing and Language Comprehension: A Combined MEG-DTI Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00875
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiwon Shin, Jared Rowley, Rasheda Chowdhury, Pierre Jolicoeur, Denise Klein, Christophe Grova, Pedro Rosa-Neto, Eliane Kobayashi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 13%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 10 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Psychology 5 11%
Linguistics 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 20 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,215,484
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,132
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,477
of 352,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#222
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.