You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Vagus Nerve Stimulation-Induced Laryngeal Motor Evoked Potentials: A Possible Biomarker of Effective Nerve Activation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00880 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simone Vespa, Lars Stumpp, Charlotte Bouckaert, Jean Delbeke, Hugo Smets, Joaquin Cury, Susana Ferrao Santos, Herbert Rooijakkers, Antoine Nonclercq, Robrecht Raedt, Kristl Vonck, Riëm El Tahry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 38 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 9 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 7% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 3% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 42 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2019.
All research outputs
#17,750,366
of 26,069,033 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,230
of 11,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#223,729
of 352,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#250
of 331 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,069,033 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,750 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 331 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.