You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effect of User Practice on Prosthetic Finger Control With an Intuitive Myoelectric Decoder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.00891 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Agamemnon Krasoulis, Sethu Vijayakumar, Kianoush Nazarpour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 53% |
| United States | 2 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 8 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 74 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 32 | 43% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#3,638,032
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,061
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,209
of 352,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#86
of 358 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 358 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.