↓ Skip to main content

Musical Sound Quality as a Function of the Number of Channels in Modern Cochlear Implant Recipients

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Musical Sound Quality as a Function of the Number of Channels in Modern Cochlear Implant Recipients
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.00999
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katelyn Berg, Jack Noble, Benoit Dawant, Robert Dwyer, Robert Labadie, Virginia Richards, René Gifford

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 16 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 12 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Psychology 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 18 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2020.
All research outputs
#5,251,486
of 25,542,788 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,983
of 11,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,858
of 357,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#102
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,542,788 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,604 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.