↓ Skip to main content

Efficient Implementation of Cerebellar Purkinje Cell With the CORDIC Algorithm on LaCSNN

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficient Implementation of Cerebellar Purkinje Cell With the CORDIC Algorithm on LaCSNN
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01078
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xinyu Hao, Shuangming Yang, Jiang Wang, Bin Deng, Xile Wei, Guosheng Yi

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Student > Postgraduate 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 33%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Unknown 3 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,424,278
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,177
of 11,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,820
of 369,086 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#306
of 375 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 369,086 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 375 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.