You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bioscaffold-Induced Brain Tissue Regeneration
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2019.01156 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michel Modo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Australia | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| United States | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 73% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 13% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 44 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 16 | 15% |
| Engineering | 11 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 48 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2020.
All research outputs
#4,713,034
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,619
of 11,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,210
of 383,161 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#98
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 383,161 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.