↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Mitochondria and Endoplasmic Reticulum Dysfunction in Parkinson’s Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01171
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandeep Kumar Barodia, Krishnan Prabhakaran, Smitha Karunakaran, Vikas Mishra, Victor Tapias

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 7%
Professor 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 7 25%
Unknown 10 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 21%
Neuroscience 6 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 December 2019.
All research outputs
#3,316,173
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#2,450
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,750
of 382,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#70
of 353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 382,799 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.