↓ Skip to main content

Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Persistent Orofacial Pain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
63 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Peripheral and Central Mechanisms of Persistent Orofacial Pain
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2019
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2019.01227
Pubmed ID
Authors

Masamichi Shinoda, Asako Kubo, Yoshinori Hayashi, Koichi Iwata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Other 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Other 12 16%
Unknown 23 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 23%
Neuroscience 11 15%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 28 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2023.
All research outputs
#2,830,609
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,808
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,620
of 375,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#52
of 328 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 375,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 328 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.