You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Neurodegenerative Susceptibility During Maternal Nutritional Programing: Are Central and Peripheral Innate Immune Training Relevant?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00013 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marcela Cárdenas-Tueme, Larisa Montalvo-Martínez, Roger Maldonado-Ruiz, Alberto Camacho-Morales, Diana Reséndez-Pérez |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 2 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 34 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 10 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 6 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2020.
All research outputs
#7,940,727
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,041
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,865
of 474,670 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#125
of 295 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 474,670 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 295 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.