You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Structural Variants May Be a Source of Missing Heritability in sALS
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00047 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Frances Theunissen, Loren L. Flynn, Ryan S. Anderton, Frank Mastaglia, Julia Pytte, Leanne Jiang, Stuart Hodgetts, Daniel K. Burns, Ann Saunders, Sue Fletcher, Steve D. Wilton, Patrick Anthony Akkari |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 3 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 92% |
| Scientists | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 65 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 12% |
| Researcher | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 29% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 11% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2020.
All research outputs
#2,276,667
of 25,622,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,342
of 11,639 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,056
of 475,933 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#36
of 300 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,622,179 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,639 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,933 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 300 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.