You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical Review of Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation: Challenges for Translation to Clinical Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00284 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jonathan Y. Y. Yap, Charlotte Keatch, Elisabeth Lambert, Will Woods, Paul R. Stoddart, Tatiana Kameneva |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 485 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 61 | 13% |
| Researcher | 43 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 78 | 16% |
| Unknown | 201 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 68 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 60 | 12% |
| Engineering | 38 | 8% |
| Psychology | 26 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 4% |
| Other | 58 | 12% |
| Unknown | 217 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 92. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2024.
All research outputs
#469,382
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#202
of 11,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,652
of 409,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4
of 366 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,698 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,416 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 366 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.