You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms of Dexmedetomidine in Neuropathic Pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, May 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yang Zhao, Jianshuai He, Ning Yu, Changxin Jia, Shilei Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 25% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| France | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 7% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 34 | 27% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 4% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 3% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 59 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2022.
All research outputs
#2,708,573
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,696
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,114
of 413,273 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#123
of 382 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 413,273 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 382 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.