You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Systematic Review Establishing the Current State-of-the-Art, the Limitations, and the DESIRED Checklist in Studies of Direct Neural Interfacing With Robotic Gait Devices in Stroke Rehabilitation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00578 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Olive Lennon, Michele Tonellato, Alessandra Del Felice, Roberto Di Marco, Caitriona Fingleton, Attila Korik, Eleonora Guanziroli, Franco Molteni, Christoph Guger, Rupert Otner, Damien Coyle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 107 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 38 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 20 | 19% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 7% |
| Unknown | 49 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2020.
All research outputs
#2,306,788
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,369
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,591
of 432,340 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#102
of 389 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,340 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 389 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.