You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Potential of Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy-Based Neurofeedback—A Systematic Review and Recommendations for Best Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00594 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon H. Kohl, David M. A. Mehler, Michael Lührs, Robert T. Thibault, Kerstin Konrad, Bettina Sorger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Germany | 2 | 15% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 15% |
| United States | 1 | 8% |
| Australia | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 3 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 54% |
| Scientists | 3 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 242 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 242 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Researcher | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 94 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 43 | 18% |
| Neuroscience | 26 | 11% |
| Engineering | 19 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 105 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,793,915
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#930
of 11,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,381
of 430,194 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#53
of 359 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,194 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 359 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.