You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Phase Synchronization Measures for Identifying Stimulus-Induced Functional Connectivity in Human Magnetoencephalographic and Simulated Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00648 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kenji Yoshinaga, Masao Matsuhashi, Tatsuya Mima, Hidenao Fukuyama, Ryosuke Takahashi, Takashi Hanakawa, Akio Ikeda |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 61 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 25% |
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 8% |
| Unknown | 17 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 14 | 23% |
| Engineering | 6 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 23 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,692,589
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,094
of 11,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,460
of 435,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#294
of 381 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,678 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,573 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 381 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.