You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Not All Competitions Come to Harm! Competitive Biofeedback to Increase Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia in Managers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.00855 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Elisabetta Patron, Marianna Munafò, Simone Messerotti Benvenuti, Luciano Stegagno, Daniela Palomba |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Austria | 1 | 6% |
| Poland | 1 | 6% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Chile | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 16% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 9 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 27 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,989,138
of 25,563,770 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,099
of 11,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,349
of 425,831 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#71
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,563,770 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,831 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.