You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison Between Blood-Brain Barrier Water Exchange Rate and Permeability to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agent in an Elderly Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.571480 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xingfeng Shao, Kay Jann, Samantha J., Lirong Yan, Axel Montagne, John M. Ringman, Berislav V. Zlokovic, Danny J. J. Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 62 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 17 | 27% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 15% |
| Unknown | 24 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,053,752
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,154
of 11,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,610
of 523,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#68
of 354 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,625 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 523,418 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 354 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.