You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exposure to Artificial Light at Night and the Consequences for Flora, Fauna, and Ecosystems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2020.602796 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jack Falcón, Alicia Torriglia, Dina Attia, Françoise Viénot, Claude Gronfier, Francine Behar-Cohen, Christophe Martinsons, David Hicks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 3% |
| Turkey | 1 | 3% |
| Czechia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 65% |
| Scientists | 9 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 227 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 28 | 12% |
| Researcher | 25 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 4% |
| Other | 30 | 13% |
| Unknown | 83 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 53 | 23% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 15 | 7% |
| Engineering | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 16% |
| Unknown | 92 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 53. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2023.
All research outputs
#814,588
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#344
of 11,682 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,301
of 416,579 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#10
of 338 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,682 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 416,579 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 338 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.