↓ Skip to main content

Coupled VO2 Oscillators Circuit as Analog First Layer Filter in Convolutional Neural Networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coupled VO2 Oscillators Circuit as Analog First Layer Filter in Convolutional Neural Networks
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2021.628254
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisabetta Corti, Joaquin Antonio Cornejo Jimenez, Kham M. Niang, John Robertson, Kirsten E. Moselund, Bernd Gotsmann, Adrian M. Ionescu, Siegfried Karg

Abstract

In this work we present an in-memory computing platform based on coupled VO2 oscillators fabricated in a crossbar configuration on silicon. Compared to existing platforms, the crossbar configuration promises significant improvements in terms of area density and oscillation frequency. Further, the crossbar devices exhibit low variability and extended reliability, hence, enabling experiments on 4-coupled oscillator. We demonstrate the neuromorphic computing capabilities using the phase relation of the oscillators. As an application, we propose to replace digital filtering operation in a convolutional neural network with oscillating circuits. The concept is tested with a VGG13 architecture on the MNIST dataset, achieving performances of 95% in the recognition task.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 29%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Master 3 7%
Other 2 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 11 26%
Physics and Astronomy 6 14%
Materials Science 2 5%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 18 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2021.
All research outputs
#2,968,377
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,934
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,689
of 537,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#126
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 537,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.