↓ Skip to main content

How Negative Experience Influences the Brain: A Comprehensive Review of the Neurobiological Underpinnings of Nocebo Hyperalgesia

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Negative Experience Influences the Brain: A Comprehensive Review of the Neurobiological Underpinnings of Nocebo Hyperalgesia
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2021.652552
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mia A. Thomaidou, Kaya J. Peerdeman, Melissa I. Koppeschaar, Andrea W. M. Evers, Dieuwke S. Veldhuijzen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Master 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Researcher 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 10 20%
Neuroscience 5 10%
Sports and Recreations 4 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 20 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2021.
All research outputs
#7,154,236
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,638
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,791
of 453,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#221
of 399 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,503 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 399 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.