You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Examining Individual and Synergistic Contributions of PTSD and Genetics to Blood Pressure: A Trans-Ethnic Meta-Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.678503 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jennifer A. Sumner, Adam X. Maihofer, Vasiliki Michopoulos, Alex O. Rothbaum, Lynn M. Almli, Ole A. Andreassen, Allison E. Ashley-Koch, Dewleen G. Baker, Jean C. Beckham, Bekh Bradley, Gerome Breen, Jonathan R. I. Coleman, Anders M. Dale, Michelle F. Dennis, Norah C. Feeny, Carol E. Franz, Melanie E. Garrett, Charles F. Gillespie, Guia Guffanti, Michael A. Hauser, Sian M. J. Hemmings, Tanja Jovanovic, Nathan A. Kimbrel, William S. Kremen, Bruce R. Lawford, Mark W. Logue, Adriana Lori, Michael J. Lyons, Jessica Maples-Keller, Matig R. Mavissakalian, Regina E. McGlinchey, Divya Mehta, Rebecca Mellor, William Milberg, Mark W. Miller, Charles Phillip Morris, Matthew S. Panizzon, Kerry J. Ressler, Victoria B. Risbrough, Barbara O. Rothbaum, Peter Roy-Byrne, Soraya Seedat, Alicia K. Smith, Jennifer S. Stevens, Leigh Luella van den Heuvel, Joanne Voisey, Ross McD Young, Lori A. Zoellner, Caroline M. Nievergelt, Erika J. Wolf |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 19% |
| Psychology | 3 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 August 2021.
All research outputs
#959,451
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#413
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,039
of 454,785 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#11
of 400 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,785 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 400 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.