↓ Skip to main content

Evidence for Cognitive Decline in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence for Cognitive Decline in Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2021.737874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xueying Zhang, Rui Gao, Changteng Zhang, Hai Chen, Ruiqun Wang, Qi Zhao, Tao Zhu, Chan Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 67 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 10%
Student > Master 7 10%
Researcher 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Unspecified 3 4%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 32 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 10%
Neuroscience 7 10%
Psychology 6 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 31 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,624,585
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,053
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,342
of 435,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#77
of 404 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 404 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.