You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effect of Brain–Computer Interface Training on Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Dysfunction After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2021.766879 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weiwei Yang, Xiaoyun Zhang, Zhenjing Li, Qiongfang Zhang, Chunhua Xue, Yaping Huai |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 31 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Researcher | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 15 | 48% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 4 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Engineering | 2 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2022.
All research outputs
#16,059,145
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,082
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,963
of 519,272 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#189
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 519,272 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.