You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Weakly supervised learning analysis of Aβ plaque distribution in the whole rat brain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.1097019 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhiyi Chen, Weijie Zheng, Keliang Pang, Debin Xia, Lingxiao Guo, Xuejin Chen, Feng Wu, Hao Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
| Researcher | 1 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2023.
All research outputs
#4,840,893
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#3,671
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,618
of 472,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#65
of 445 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 472,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 445 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.