↓ Skip to main content

Plausible Mechanism of Sham Acupuncture Based on Biomarkers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Plausible Mechanism of Sham Acupuncture Based on Biomarkers: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, February 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.834112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tae-Hun Kim, Myeong Soo Lee, Stephen Birch, Terje Alraek

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Student > Master 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 4 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2022.
All research outputs
#17,619,915
of 25,827,956 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#8,238
of 11,717 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#312,930
of 524,189 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#238
of 363 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,827,956 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,717 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,189 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 363 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.