↓ Skip to main content

Consensus Definition of Misophonia: A Delphi Study

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
25 X users
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Consensus Definition of Misophonia: A Delphi Study
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.841816
Pubmed ID
Authors

Susan E. Swedo, David M. Baguley, Damiaan Denys, Laura J. Dixon, Mercede Erfanian, Alessandra Fioretti, Pawel J. Jastreboff, Sukhbinder Kumar, M. Zachary Rosenthal, Romke Rouw, Daniela Schiller, Julia Simner, Eric A. Storch, Steven Taylor, Kathy R. Vander Werff, Cara M. Altimus, Sylvina M. Raver

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 11 14%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 5%
Professor 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 37 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 11 14%
Psychology 11 14%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 36 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 101. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#418,458
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#183
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,819
of 462,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9
of 426 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 462,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 426 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.