You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Microscopy-BIDS: An Extension to the Brain Imaging Data Structure for Microscopy Data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.871228 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marie-Hélène Bourget, Lee Kamentsky, Satrajit S. Ghosh, Giacomo Mazzamuto, Alberto Lazari, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Robert Oostenveld, Guiomar Niso, Yaroslav O. Halchenko, Ilona Lipp, Sylvain Takerkart, Paule-Joanne Toussaint, Ali R. Khan, Gustav Nilsonne, Filippo Maria Castelli, The BIDS Maintainers, Julien Cohen-Adad, Stefan Appelhoff, Ross Blair, Eric Earl, Franklin Feingold, Anthony Galassi, Rémi Gau, Christopher J. Markiewicz, Taylor Salo |
| Abstract |
The Brain Imaging Data Structure (BIDS) is a specification for organizing, sharing, and archiving neuroimaging data and metadata in a reusable way. First developed for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets, the community-led specification evolved rapidly to include other modalities such as magnetoencephalography, positron emission tomography, and quantitative MRI (qMRI). In this work, we present an extension to BIDS for microscopy imaging data, along with example datasets. Microscopy-BIDS supports common imaging methods, including 2D/3D, ex/in vivo, micro-CT, and optical and electron microscopy. Microscopy-BIDS also includes comprehensible metadata definitions for hardware, image acquisition, and sample properties. This extension will facilitate future harmonization efforts in the context of multi-modal, multi-scale imaging such as the characterization of tissue microstructure with qMRI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 56% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 27% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 7% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 3 | 20% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,298,157
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#1,360
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,484
of 445,718 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#37
of 449 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,718 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 449 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.