You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Chemosensory Contributions of E-Cigarette Additives on Nicotine Use
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.893587 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Natalie L. Johnson, Theresa Patten, Minghong Ma, Mariella De Biasi, Daniel W. Wesson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 2 | 22% |
Librarian | 1 | 11% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 22% |
Environmental Science | 1 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 11% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2023.
All research outputs
#8,544,090
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#5,449
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,388
of 435,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#167
of 490 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,204 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 490 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.