↓ Skip to main content

Identification of the common differentially expressed genes and pathogenesis between neuropathic pain and aging

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification of the common differentially expressed genes and pathogenesis between neuropathic pain and aging
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2022.994575
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qingqing Ye, Zhensheng Huang, Weicheng Lu, Fang Yan, Weian Zeng, Jingdun Xie, Weiqiang Zhong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,126,533
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,611
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,712
of 441,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#113
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.