You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of the common differentially expressed genes and pathogenesis between neuropathic pain and aging
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Neuroscience, October 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fnins.2022.994575 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Qingqing Ye, Zhensheng Huang, Weicheng Lu, Fang Yan, Weian Zeng, Jingdun Xie, Weiqiang Zhong |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Pakistan | 1 | 13% |
Ireland | 1 | 13% |
Canada | 1 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 13% |
Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 6 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2022.
All research outputs
#7,126,533
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,611
of 11,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,712
of 441,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#113
of 447 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,083 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 447 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.