↓ Skip to main content

Histochemical mapping of the duration of action of photobiomodulation on cytochrome c oxidase in the rat brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Histochemical mapping of the duration of action of photobiomodulation on cytochrome c oxidase in the rat brain
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2023.1243527
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zachary S. Wade, Douglas W. Barrett, Roger E. Davis, Adrian Nguyen, Sindhu Venkat, F. Gonzalez-Lima

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#20,928,485
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,605
of 11,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,557
of 357,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#241
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,672 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,274 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.