↓ Skip to main content

Effect of a processing delay between direct and delayed sound in simulated open fit hearing aids on speech intelligibility in noise

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of a processing delay between direct and delayed sound in simulated open fit hearing aids on speech intelligibility in noise
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2023.1257720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sebastian Roth, Franz-Ullrich Müller, Julian Angermeier, Werner Hemmert, Stefan Zirn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 33%
Researcher 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 1 33%
Engineering 1 33%
Unknown 1 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,972,481
of 25,758,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#9,625
of 11,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#247,038
of 354,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#175
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,706 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,151 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.