↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of local activation, functional connectivity, and structural connectivity in the N-back task

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of local activation, functional connectivity, and structural connectivity in the N-back task
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, March 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2024.1337976
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takatoshi Satake, Ai Taki, Kazumi Kasahara, Daisuke Yoshimaru, Tomokazu Tsurugizawa

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,170,701
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#7,151
of 11,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,221
of 228,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#74
of 141 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 141 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.