↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy of acupuncture for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy of acupuncture for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Neuroscience, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fnins.2024.1347651
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yawen Tan, Ruqian Duan, Chuanbiao Wen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2024.
All research outputs
#7,923,787
of 25,937,538 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#4,974
of 11,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,386
of 213,830 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Neuroscience
#31
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,937,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,830 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.