↓ Skip to main content

Neural Correlates of Stimulus–Response and Response–Outcome Associations in Dorsolateral Versus Dorsomedial Striatum

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural Correlates of Stimulus–Response and Response–Outcome Associations in Dorsolateral Versus Dorsomedial Striatum
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2010
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2010.00012
Pubmed ID
Authors

Thomas A. Stalnaker, Gwendolyn G. Calhoon, Masaaki Ogawa, Matthew R. Roesch, Geoffrey Schoenbaum

Abstract

Considerable evidence suggests that there is functional heterogeneity in the control of behavior by the dorsal striatum. Dorsomedial striatum may support goal-directed behavior by representing associations between responses and outcomes (R-O associations). The dorsolateral striatum, in contrast, may support motor habits by encoding associations between stimuli and responses (S-R associations). To test whether neural correlates in striatum in fact conform to this pattern, we recorded single-units in dorsomedial and dorsolateral striatum of rats performing a task in which R-O contingencies were manipulated independently of S-R contingencies. Among response-selective neurons in both regions, activity was significantly modulated by the initial stimulus, providing evidence of S-R encoding. Similarly, response selectivity was significantly modulated by the associated outcome in both regions, providing evidence of R-O encoding. In both regions, this outcome-modulation did not seem to reflect the relative value of the expected outcome, but rather its specific identity. Finally, in both regions we found correlates of the available action-outcome contingencies reflected in the baseline activity of many neurons. These results suggest that differences in information content in these two regions may not determine the differential roles they play in controlling behavior, demonstrated in previous studies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 7 4%
United States 6 3%
Japan 2 1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 169 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 61 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 25%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 8%
Student > Master 14 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 7%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 13 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 61 32%
Neuroscience 43 23%
Psychology 38 20%
Computer Science 9 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 5%
Other 10 5%
Unknown 19 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#17,664,478
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#643
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,147
of 163,537 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 163,537 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.