↓ Skip to main content

Identifying a Network of Brain Regions Involved in Aversion-Related Processing: A Cross-Species Translational Investigation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identifying a Network of Brain Regions Involved in Aversion-Related Processing: A Cross-Species Translational Investigation
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2011.00049
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dave J. Hayes, Georg Northoff

Abstract

The ability to detect and respond appropriately to aversive stimuli is essential for all organisms, from fruit flies to humans. This suggests the existence of a core neural network which mediates aversion-related processing. Human imaging studies on aversion have highlighted the involvement of various cortical regions, such as the prefrontal cortex, while animal studies have focused largely on subcortical regions like the periaqueductal gray and hypothalamus. However, whether and how these regions form a core neural network of aversion remains unclear. To help determine this, a translational cross-species investigation in humans (i.e., meta-analysis) and other animals (i.e., systematic review of functional neuroanatomy) was performed. Our results highlighted the recruitment of the anterior cingulate cortex, the anterior insula, and the amygdala as well as other subcortical (e.g., thalamus, midbrain) and cortical (e.g., orbitofrontal) regions in both animals and humans. Importantly, involvement of these regions remained independent of sensory modality. This study provides evidence for a core neural network mediating aversion in both animals and humans. This not only contributes to our understanding of the trans-species neural correlates of aversion but may also carry important implications for psychiatric disorders where abnormal aversive behavior can often be observed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Canada 3 3%
Germany 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 102 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 23%
Student > Master 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 31 27%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 23%
Neuroscience 22 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 13 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2023.
All research outputs
#3,381,273
of 23,556,846 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#176
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,660
of 183,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#12
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,556,846 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 183,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.