↓ Skip to main content

How Emotions Change Time

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How Emotions Change Time
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2011.00058
Pubmed ID
Authors

Annett Schirmer

Abstract

Experimental evidence suggests that emotions can both speed-up and slow-down the internal clock. Speeding up has been observed for to-be-timed emotional stimuli that have the capacity to sustain attention, whereas slowing down has been observed for to-be-timed neutral stimuli that are presented in the context of emotional distractors. These effects have been explained by mechanisms that involve changes in bodily arousal, attention, or sentience. A review of these mechanisms suggests both merits and difficulties in the explanation of the emotion-timing link. Therefore, a hybrid mechanism involving stimulus-specific sentient representations is proposed as a candidate for mediating emotional influences on time. According to this proposal, emotional events enhance sentient representations, which in turn support temporal estimates. Emotional stimuli with a larger share in ones sentience are then perceived as longer than neutral stimuli with a smaller share.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 4%
Brazil 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 19 13%
Student > Master 14 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 34 23%
Unknown 21 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 69 47%
Neuroscience 10 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 26 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,873,047
of 25,791,949 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#322
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,296
of 192,659 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#17
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,791,949 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,659 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.