You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Developmental neuroscience of time and number: implications for autism and other neurodevelopmental disabilities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2012
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnint.2012.00007 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Melissa J. Allman, Kevin A. Pelphrey, Warren H. Meck |
| Abstract |
Estimations of time and number share many similarities in both non-humans and man. The primary focus of this review is on the development of time and number sense across infancy and childhood, and neuropsychological findings as they relate to time and number discrimination in infants and adults. Discussion of these findings is couched within a mode-control model of timing and counting which assumes time and number share a common magnitude representation system. A basic sense of time and number likely serves as the foundation for advanced numerical and temporal competence, and aspects of higher cognition-this will be discussed as it relates to typical childhood, and certain developmental disorders, including autism spectrum disorder. Directions for future research in the developmental neuroscience of time and number (NEUTIN) will also be highlighted. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Poland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 184 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
| Professor | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 20% |
| Unknown | 27 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 80 | 41% |
| Neuroscience | 23 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 12% |
| Unknown | 36 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,250,450
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#276
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,543
of 244,123 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#28
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,123 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.