↓ Skip to main content

Hypothalamic neurohormones and immune responses

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypothalamic neurohormones and immune responses
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2013.00056
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Luis Quintanar, Irene Guzmán-Soto

Abstract

The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive examination of the current literature describing the neural-immune interactions, with emphasis on the most recent findings of the effects of neurohormones on immune system. Particularly, the role of hypothalamic hormones such as Thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH), Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) and Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). In the past few years, interest has been raised in extrapituitary actions of these neurohormones due to their receptors have been found in many non-pituitary tissues. Also, the receptors are present in immune cells, suggesting an autocrine or paracrine role within the immune system. In general, these neurohormones have been reported to exert immunomodulatory effects on cell proliferation, immune mediators release and cell function. The implications of these findings in understanding the network of hypothalamic neuropeptides and immune system are discussed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 20%
Student > Master 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 8 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 19%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 13%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Psychology 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 9 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2023.
All research outputs
#8,060,211
of 24,482,039 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#351
of 894 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,205
of 290,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#50
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,482,039 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 894 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.