↓ Skip to main content

How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 918)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
twitter
98 X users
facebook
15 Facebook pages
googleplus
3 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
308 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2013.00065
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leo Pascual, Paulo Rodrigues, David Gallardo-Pujol

Abstract

Neural underpinnings of morality are not yet well understood. Researchers in moral neuroscience have tried to find specific structures and processes that shed light on how morality works. Here, we review the main brain areas that have been associated with morality at both structural and functional levels and speculate about how it can be studied. Orbital and ventromedial prefrontal cortices are implicated in emotionally-driven moral decisions, while dorsolateral prefrontal cortex appears to moderate its response. These competing processes may be mediated by the anterior cingulate cortex. Parietal and temporal structures play important roles in the attribution of others' beliefs and intentions. The insular cortex is engaged during empathic processes. Other regions seem to play a more complementary role in morality. Morality is supported not by a single brain circuitry or structure, but by several circuits overlapping with other complex processes. The identification of the core features of morality and moral-related processes is needed. Neuroscience can provide meaningful insights in order to delineate the boundaries of morality in conjunction with moral psychology.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 98 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 308 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Uganda 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 296 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 48 16%
Student > Bachelor 37 12%
Researcher 31 10%
Professor 17 6%
Other 68 22%
Unknown 48 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 88 29%
Neuroscience 42 14%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 6%
Other 59 19%
Unknown 62 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#234,232
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#6
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,487
of 290,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#2
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,813 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.