↓ Skip to main content

Executive dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease and timing deficits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
14 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
198 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Executive dysfunction in Parkinson’s disease and timing deficits
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2013.00075
Pubmed ID
Authors

Krystal L. Parker, Dronacharya Lamichhane, Marcelo S. Caetano, Nandakumar S. Narayanan

Abstract

Patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) have deficits in perceptual timing, or the perception and estimation of time. PD patients can also have cognitive symptoms, including deficits in executive functions such as working memory, planning, and visuospatial attention. Here, we discuss how PD-related cognitive symptoms contribute to timing deficits. Timing is influenced by signaling of the neurotransmitter dopamine in the striatum. Timing also involves the frontal cortex, which is dysfunctional in PD. Frontal cortex impairments in PD may influence memory subsystems as well as decision processes during timing tasks. These data suggest that timing may be a type of executive function. As such, timing can be used to study the neural circuitry of cognitive symptoms of PD as they can be studied in animal models. Performance of timing tasks also maybe a useful clinical biomarker of frontal as well as striatal dysfunction in PD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 192 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Bachelor 21 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 23 12%
Unknown 44 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 52 26%
Psychology 34 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 22 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 7%
Engineering 6 3%
Other 26 13%
Unknown 45 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2022.
All research outputs
#1,843,831
of 23,575,346 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#97
of 871 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,165
of 284,677 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#19
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,346 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 871 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,677 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.