You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Functional testing in animal models of spinal cord injury: not as straight forward as one would think
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2013
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fnint.2013.00085 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karim Fouad, Caitlin Hurd, David S. K. Magnuson |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 30% |
| Researcher | 18 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 12 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 29 | 30% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 12% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 18% |
| Unknown | 14 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2018.
All research outputs
#2,024,338
of 23,025,074 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#106
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,658
of 282,207 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#21
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,025,074 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,207 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.