↓ Skip to main content

Primary motor cortex and fast feedback responses to mechanical perturbations: a primer on what we know now and some suggestions on what we should find out next

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary motor cortex and fast feedback responses to mechanical perturbations: a primer on what we know now and some suggestions on what we should find out next
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, September 2014
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2014.00072
Pubmed ID
Authors

J. Andrew Pruszynski

Abstract

Many researchers have drawn a clear distinction between fast feedback responses to mechanical perturbations (e.g., stretch responses) and voluntary control processes. But this simple distinction is difficult to reconcile with growing evidence that long-latency stretch responses share most of the defining capabilities of voluntary control. My general view-and I believe a growing consensus-is that the functional similarities between long-latency stretch responses and voluntary control processes can be readily understood based on their shared neural circuitry, especially a transcortical pathway through primary motor cortex. Here I provide a very brief and selective account of the human and monkey studies linking a transcortical pathway through primary motor cortex to the generation and functional sophistication of the long-latency stretch response. I then lay out some of the notable issues that are ready to be answered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Slovenia 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 84 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 31%
Researcher 17 19%
Student > Master 12 13%
Professor 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 27 30%
Engineering 19 21%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Psychology 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 October 2017.
All research outputs
#6,031,464
of 22,761,738 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#260
of 853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,533
of 246,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#4
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,761,738 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 246,448 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.