↓ Skip to main content

Long-latency reflexes account for limb biomechanics through several supraspinal pathways

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
68 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
141 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Long-latency reflexes account for limb biomechanics through several supraspinal pathways
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2014.00099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Isaac L. Kurtzer

Abstract

Accurate control of body posture is enforced by a multitude of corrective actions operating over a range of time scales. The earliest correction is the short-latency reflex (SLR) which occurs between 20-45 ms following a sudden displacement of the limb and is generated entirely by spinal circuits. In contrast, voluntary reactions are generated by a highly distributed network but at a significantly longer delay after stimulus onset (greater than 100 ms). Between these two epochs is the long-latency reflex (LLR) (around 50-100 ms) which acts more rapidly than voluntary reactions but shares some supraspinal pathways and functional capabilities. In particular, the LLR accounts for the arm's biomechanical properties rather than only responding to local muscle stretch like the SLR. This paper will review how the LLR accounts for the arm's biomechanical properties and the supraspinal pathways supporting this ability. Relevant experimental paradigms include clinical studies, non-invasive brain stimulation, neural recordings in monkeys, and human behavioral studies. The sum of this effort indicates that primary motor cortex and reticular formation (RF) contribute to the LLR either by generating or scaling its structured response appropriate for the arm's biomechanics whereas the cerebellum scales the magnitude of the feedback response. Additional putative pathways are discussed as well as potential research lines.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 137 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 23%
Student > Bachelor 23 16%
Student > Master 20 14%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 24 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 30 21%
Engineering 25 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 5%
Sports and Recreations 7 5%
Other 18 13%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,740,304
of 24,846,849 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#274
of 901 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,654
of 364,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,846,849 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 901 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,577 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.