↓ Skip to main content

Area V5—a microcosm of the visual brain

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Area V5—a microcosm of the visual brain
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, April 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2015.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Semir Zeki

Abstract

Area V5 of the visual brain, first identified anatomically in 1969 as a separate visual area, is critical for the perception of visual motion. As one of the most intensively studied parts of the visual brain, it has yielded many insights into how the visual brain operates. Among these are: the diversity of signals that determine the functional capacities of a visual area; the relationship between single cell activity in a specialized visual area and perception of, and preference for, attributes of a visual stimulus; the multiple asynchronous inputs into, and outputs from, an area as well as the multiple operations that it undertakes asynchronously; the relationship between activity at given, specialized, areas of the visual brain and conscious awareness; and the mechanisms used to "bind" signals from one area with those from another, with a different specialization, to give us our unitary perception of the visual world. Hence V5 is, in a sense, a microcosm of the visual world and its study gives important insights into how the whole visual brain is organized-anatomically, functionally and perceptually.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 202 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Student > Bachelor 38 18%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Master 19 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 10 5%
Other 38 18%
Unknown 37 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 59 28%
Psychology 40 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 14 7%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 23 11%
Unknown 51 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2018.
All research outputs
#6,549,486
of 25,804,096 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#257
of 920 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,803
of 280,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,804,096 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 920 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.