↓ Skip to main content

Beyond reward prediction errors: the role of dopamine in movement kinematics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
23 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Beyond reward prediction errors: the role of dopamine in movement kinematics
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, May 2015
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2015.00039
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joseph W. Barter, Suellen Li, Dongye Lu, Ryan A. Bartholomew, Mark A. Rossi, Charles T. Shoemaker, Daniel Salas-Meza, Erin Gaidis, Henry H. Yin

Abstract

We recorded activity of dopamine (DA) neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta in unrestrained mice while monitoring their movements with video tracking. Our approach allows an unbiased examination of the continuous relationship between single unit activity and behavior. Although DA neurons show characteristic burst firing following cue or reward presentation, as previously reported, their activity can be explained by the representation of actual movement kinematics. Unlike neighboring pars reticulata GABAergic output neurons, which can represent vector components of position, DA neurons represent vector components of velocity or acceleration. We found neurons related to movements in four directions-up, down, left, right. For horizontal movements, there is significant lateralization of neurons: the left nigra contains more rightward neurons, whereas the right nigra contains more leftward neurons. The relationship between DA activity and movement kinematics was found on both appetitive trials using sucrose and aversive trials using air puff, showing that these neurons belong to a velocity control circuit that can be used for any number of purposes, whether to seek reward or to avoid harm. In support of this conclusion, mimicry of the phasic activation of DA neurons with selective optogenetic stimulation could also generate movements. Contrary to the popular hypothesis that DA neurons encode reward prediction errors, our results suggest that nigrostriatal DA plays an essential role in controlling the kinematics of voluntary movements. We hypothesize that DA signaling implements gain adjustment for adaptive transition control, and describe a new model of the basal ganglia (BG) in which DA functions to adjust the gain of the transition controller. This model has significant implications for our understanding of movement disorders implicating DA and the BG.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 3 1%
United States 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 203 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 26%
Researcher 37 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 10%
Student > Master 15 7%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 33 16%
Unknown 36 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 65 31%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 21%
Psychology 26 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 3%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 41 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,004,184
of 25,165,468 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#153
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,744
of 272,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,165,468 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.