↓ Skip to main content

Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
56 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Deep Brain Stimulation Think Tank: A Review of Emerging Issues and Technologies
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, November 2016
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2016.00038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wissam Deeb, James J. Giordano, Peter J. Rossi, Alon Y. Mogilner, Aysegul Gunduz, Jack W. Judy, Bryan T. Klassen, Christopher R. Butson, Craig Van Horne, Damiaan Deny, Darin D. Dougherty, David Rowell, Greg A. Gerhardt, Gwenn S. Smith, Francisco A. Ponce, Harrison C. Walker, Helen M. Bronte-Stewart, Helen S. Mayberg, Howard J. Chizeck, Jean-Philippe Langevin, Jens Volkmann, Jill L. Ostrem, Jonathan B. Shute, Joohi Jimenez-Shahed, Kelly D. Foote, Aparna Wagle Shukla, Marvin A. Rossi, Michael Oh, Michael Pourfar, Paul B. Rosenberg, Peter A. Silburn, Coralie de Hemptine, Philip A. Starr, Timothy Denison, Umer Akbar, Warren M. Grill, Michael S. Okun

Abstract

This paper provides an overview of current progress in the technological advances and the use of deep brain stimulation (DBS) to treat neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders, as presented by participants of the Fourth Annual DBS Think Tank, which was convened in March 2016 in conjunction with the Center for Movement Disorders and Neurorestoration at the University of Florida, Gainesveille FL, USA. The Think Tank discussions first focused on policy and advocacy in DBS research and clinical practice, formation of registries, and issues involving the use of DBS in the treatment of Tourette Syndrome. Next, advances in the use of neuroimaging and electrochemical markers to enhance DBS specificity were addressed. Updates on ongoing use and developments of DBS for the treatment of Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, Alzheimer's disease, depression, post-traumatic stress disorder, obesity, addiction were presented, and progress toward innovation(s) in closed-loop applications were discussed. Each section of these proceedings provides updates and highlights of new information as presented at this year's international Think Tank, with a view toward current and near future advancement of the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 14%
Student > Master 19 9%
Other 16 8%
Student > Bachelor 15 7%
Other 50 25%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 40 20%
Neuroscience 30 15%
Engineering 20 10%
Psychology 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 5%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 56 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2017.
All research outputs
#5,330,338
of 25,711,194 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#229
of 918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#94,254
of 417,640 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,194 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 417,640 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.