↓ Skip to main content

Reciprocal Interactions Between Gut Microbiota and Host Social Behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, June 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
25 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
167 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reciprocal Interactions Between Gut Microbiota and Host Social Behavior
Published in
Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, June 2018
DOI 10.3389/fnint.2018.00021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuelle Münger, Augusto J. Montiel-Castro, Wolfgang Langhans, Gustavo Pacheco-López

Abstract

Animals harbor an extensive, dynamic microbial ecosystem in their gut. Gut microbiota (GM) supposedly modulate various host functions including fecundity, metabolism, immunity, cognition and behavior. Starting by analyzing the concept of the holobiont as a unit of selection, we highlight recent findings suggesting an intimate link between GM and animal social behavior. We consider two reciprocal emerging themes: (i) that GM influence host social behavior; and (ii) that social behavior and social structure shape the composition of the GM across individuals. We propose that, throughout a long history of coevolution, GM may have become involved in the modulation of their host's sociality to foster their own transmission, while in turn social organization may have fine-tuned the transmission of beneficial endosymbionts and prevented pathogen infection. We suggest that investigating these reciprocal interactions can advance our understanding of sociality, from healthy and impaired social cognition to the evolution of specific social behaviors and societal structure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 167 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 167 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 14%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 51 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 10%
Neuroscience 15 9%
Psychology 7 4%
Environmental Science 5 3%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 61 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,336,677
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#72
of 899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,855
of 333,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,747 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.